Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA18594; Thu, 7 Apr 1994 20:46:16 -0700 Return-Path: <yoshino@gtewd.mtv.gtegsc.com-DeleteThis> Received: from MtV2.mtv.gtegsc.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (16.6/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA13438; Thu, 7 Apr 94 20:47:13 -0700 Received: by gtewd (MX V3.2) id 19439; Thu, 07 Apr 1994 20:44:56 PDT Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1994 20:44:54 PDT From: EarlMacHack <yoshino@gtewd.mtv.gtegsc.com-DeleteThis> Reply-To: yoshino@gtewd.mtv.gtegsc.com-DeleteThis To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Message-Id: <0097C9DF.6E2AD5A0.19439@gtewd> Subject: RE: San Louis Res. question
The sailable level at San Luis depends on the amount of WEEDS growing at the
time. Right now I'd guess (I haven't been there this season yet) that there
aren't many long weeds since they tend to die off during the cold months.
So any level should be sailable :)
But come June watch out! I usually look for at least 220. Of course the real
solution is to buy a WEED FIN (I bought mine last year). Then you won't have
a problem.
By the way, the weed problem exists mostly going into and out of the shores.
Once you are planing then there isn't a problem.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:27:12 PST