RE: Tues at 3rd

From: rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com
Date: Wed Aug 29 2001 - 08:30:14 PDT


X-OldHeader: From rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com  Wed Aug 29 08:30:25 2001
Return-Path: <rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA00370 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com
Received: from msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com [141.183.101.235]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA08173 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kim.wellsfargo.com (kim.wellsfargo.com [192.246.108.37]) by msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F2F84D for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:30:21 +0800 (SGP)
Received: from unixm1.wellsfargo.com (unixm1.wellsfargo.com [10.26.27.229]) by kim.wellsfargo.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7TFUIS03788 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xcgi-casfo-02.wellsfargo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unixm1.wellsfargo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA12680 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xcgi-casfo-02.wellsfargo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <RNHP47F2>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:16 -0700
Message-ID: <583643968681D4119D170001FA7EEA810413A636@xcem-casfo-04.wellsfargo.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
Subject: RE: Tues at 3rd
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:14 -0700
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)


I headed out of my office to go to 3rd, but the 3:30 page from Coyote showed
WSW. I don't like WSW on the peninsula, so I changed plans and went to
Isabel. From Ken's note, it would seem as though shifting wind was not an
issue. True?

Cindoll

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Poulton [mailto:poulton@zonker.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:32 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK
Subject: Tues at 3rd

============= Tue 28 Aug 01 - 3rd - 4.7/257 (196#) 3:30-5:30

22 knots at 2:00 got me out of the office, and 24-27 knots from 3:00 to
5:00 made me happy!

Water was fairly choppy, but also had big swells, even as it turned to
flood.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:20 PST