X-OldHeader: From allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com Tue Jan 9 23:39:34 2001 Return-Path: <allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id XAA10977 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id XAA07920 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtppop2pub.verizon.net (smtppop2pub.gte.net [206.46.170.21]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18A256A for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:39:33 -0700 (MST) Received: from computer (1Cust56.tnt17.sjc4.da.uu.net [63.46.241.56]) by smtppop2pub.verizon.net with SMTP for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; id BAA71066891 Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:39:00 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <000901c07ad8$12c1f6c0$38f12e3f@computer> From: "Allen H Zimmermann" <allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com> To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> References: <3A5BB8F8.EFAD962C@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com> Subject: Re: My Ideas: Coyote Point Master Plan and Improvements Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:36:38 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Plus with ASD there, we can be sure someone keeps tabs on those "pinko"
Eastern Euro's!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Lindstrom" <KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK"
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: My Ideas: Coyote Point Master Plan and Improvements
> 1. We should have a work party to remove the rocks on the shore at
> low tide or ask the drunk driver work detail to do it for us.
> I'm not sure this is something we should spend money on. 2. I
> vote NO on any competition to ASD. We want to keep them in
> business and support them, not make it tougher! Perhaps use
> some of the money to improve ASD's rental access or even a
> launch that they can use in low tide maybe up near the
> fishermen much like a 3rd Ave launch??? 3. I like the idea of
> a launch on near the Harbor. Good for overflow days and a
> better egress would be nice when I am on a sinker and the wind
> shuts off! Also needed is a rigging area there that is more
> sail friendly. 4. Token donation to stop SFO from filling the
> Bay.
>
> Kirk out
>
> Jeff Milum wrote:
>
> > I highly agree w/ Bob P here if it's possible. A launch less >
> affected by the new buildings would be a huge benefit. > >
> -----Original Message----- From: Bob Prevett >
> [mailto:prevett@nvidia.com-DeleteThis.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:11 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK Subject: RE: Coyote >
> Point Master Plan and Improvements > > Is there any possibility of
> creating a second launch site on Coyote > point that is on the West
> side of the swimming area? This would > have the advantages of
> being in clear wind and closer to the > Channel. It would be an
> intermediate/expert (no-beginner) type of > launch. I'm not too
> clear on what the topography of the land is > over there. > > BobP
> > > [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
>
> -- best regards Kirk Lindstrom Editor: "Kirk's Investing & Personal
> Finance" @ Suite101.com
> http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/investing and "Kirk's Online
> Newsletter"
> http://www.suite101.com/files/topics/270/files/WhatLetter2Buy.html
>
>
> [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:04 PST