X-OldHeader: From KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com Tue Jan 9 17:21:19 2001 Return-Path: <KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id RAA28108 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:21:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id RAA12536 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:21:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.177]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BA26D8 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:21:17 -0700 (MST) Received: from ix.netcom.com (user-vcaum8s.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.89.28]) by johnson.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA07952; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 20:21:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A5BB8F8.EFAD962C@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:20:56 -0800 From: Kirk Lindstrom <KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com Subject: My Ideas: Coyote Point Master Plan and Improvements References: <D36440DD7F4FD4119F1000D0B77CF80801C43389@sabahqmail.saba.com-DeleteThis.com>
1. We should have a work party to remove the rocks on the shore at
low tide or ask the drunk driver work detail to do it for us.
I'm not sure this is something we should spend money on. 2. I
vote NO on any competition to ASD. We want to keep them in
business and support them, not make it tougher! Perhaps use
some of the money to improve ASD's rental access or even a
launch that they can use in low tide maybe up near the
fishermen much like a 3rd Ave launch??? 3. I like the idea of
a launch on near the Harbor. Good for overflow days and a
better egress would be nice when I am on a sinker and the wind
shuts off! Also needed is a rigging area there that is more
sail friendly. 4. Token donation to stop SFO from filling the
Bay.
Kirk out
Jeff Milum wrote:
> I highly agree w/ Bob P here if it's possible. A launch less >
affected by the new buildings would be a huge benefit. > >
-----Original Message----- From: Bob Prevett >
[mailto:prevett@nvidia.com-DeleteThis.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:11 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK Subject: RE: Coyote >
Point Master Plan and Improvements > > Is there any possibility of
creating a second launch site on Coyote > point that is on the West
side of the swimming area? This would > have the advantages of
being in clear wind and closer to the > Channel. It would be an
intermediate/expert (no-beginner) type of > launch. I'm not too
clear on what the topography of the land is > over there. > > BobP
> > [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
-- best regards Kirk Lindstrom Editor: "Kirk's Investing & Personal
Finance" @ Suite101.com
http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/investing and "Kirk's Online
Newsletter"
http://www.suite101.com/files/topics/270/files/WhatLetter2Buy.html
[HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:04 PST