Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (root@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA18321 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com (hplms26.hpl.hp.com [15.255.168.31]) by opus.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA25739 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:20:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com-DeleteThis [24.0.0.66]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id SAA14965 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:20:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from home.com ([24.12.57.232]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <20000401021832.ONMC23297.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com-DeleteThis> for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:18:32 -0800 Message-ID: <38E55CE6.5304ADF9@home.com-DeleteThis> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:20:22 -0800 From: Bob Galvan <kasplash@home.com-DeleteThis> Organization: @Home Network X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61C-CCK-MCD AtHome0407 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: 3/27/00 SFBA - SFO meeting References: <200004010033.QAA18113@scv1.apple.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ed you are a genius!
Ed Scott wrote:
>
> >While we made it clear that mitigation cannot repair the likely damage that
> >the runways will do, we also stressed that mitigation is required and
> >necessary in the event that the runways are built.
>
> A wild hare mitigation idea, if runways are a foregone conclusion and
> practical only upon certain runway configurations:
>
> Would it be possible to put down enough fill to allow a road to run
> around the runways. Perhaps install a viewing/parking/fishing area at
> the end of one or both of the runways, with enough parking for sailors
> and rigging. It'd be loud, but it'd be farther out in the bay, allowing
> for later sessions, and a lot shorter distance to the channel. It'd have
> disadvantages (no beginner sailing, no downwind bailout except at Third
> and Coyote), but the sailing could be pretty good! You could sail
> towards Coyote, or farther out into the bay, if the light towers don't
> obstruct your wind or path. I'd like to see if this mitigation idea
> could be explored.
>
> Just a thought at 4:30 on a Friday afternoon.
>
> -Ed
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:01 PDT