Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.18/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA165399860; Thu, 1 May 1997 13:51:01 -0700 Return-Path: <bbense@shred.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> Received: from shred.stanford.edu by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA219499861; Thu, 1 May 1997 13:51:01 -0700 Received: from localhost (bbense@localhost) by shred.stanford.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA04296 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 1 May 1997 13:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 13:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Booker C. Bense" <bbense@networking.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: Is Call of the Wind Down? In-Reply-To: <199705011902.MAA24788@scv1.apple.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970501133745.3166C-100000@shred.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Edward W. Scott wrote:
> The third Genius pager I'm on just died (replaced battery with new one,
> still not powering up). I've been calling 1-800-Windcall for the last
> 1.5 hours and the line is busy. Is anyone else having trouble? Maybe
> I'm not the only one.
- I talked with Jim about this a few weeks back and he said that about
10% of the pagers are bad. ( This seems extrodinarily high to me).
Mine had some initial problems, but has been working just fine for
the last 2-3weeks. It runs through alot of batteries although that
seems to be improving as well.
>
> Anyone else having reliability problems with these pagers? I like the
> features, it's just that I'm on No. 3 looking at No. 4, and not sure if I
> want to put up with the hassle anymore or just give up and go back to the
> Advisor.
- I wouldn't go back, mostly because I get alot of email and this
pager can deal with it.
- Booker C. Bense : bbense@stanford.edu-DeleteThis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:31:45 PST