Re: Small Craft Advisory?

From: Dag Johansen (dagj@netcom.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Fri May 19 1995 - 16:58:19 PDT


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA18792; Fri, 19 May 1995 17:01:21 -0700
Return-Path: <dagj@netcom.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from netcom17.netcom.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA093688088; Fri, 19 May 1995 17:01:29 -0700
Received: from [192.0.2.1] by netcom17.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom) id QAA20203; Fri, 19 May 1995 16:57:03 -0700
X-Sender: dagj@netcom13.netcom.com-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <v01510104abe2ca051e9c@[192.0.2.1]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 16:58:19 -0700
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
From: dagj@netcom.com-DeleteThis (Dag Johansen)
Subject: Re: Small Craft Advisory?


>Is the small craft advisory because of the possibility of winds of 25 kt
>near Angel Island? How can you have a small craft advisory in only 10-20
>kt of wind? This doesn't make sense to me.

Jeez, Ed you should know. It basically says small craft advisory
all summer long for the SF bay area. I think the threshold
for a small craft advisory is very low.

        -Dag



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:29:16 PST