Re: Re: Dynafiber booms

From: Jim Paugh (James.Paugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis)
Date: Thu Nov 17 1994 - 14:43:35 PST


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA00136; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:48:47 -0800
Return-Path: <James.Paugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis>
Received: from Sun.COM by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA19394; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:48:49 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (mxchange.Eng.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA15026; Thu, 17 Nov 94 14:43:47 PST
Received: from jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6.9/mh) id OAA19017; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:42:51 -0800
Received: from jalama.eng.sun.com by jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6.9/SMI-SVR4) id OAA02483; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:43:02 -0800
Received: by jalama.eng.sun.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA19740; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:43:35 -0800
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:43:35 -0800
From: James.Paugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis (Jim Paugh)
Message-Id: <9411172243.AA19740@jalama.eng.sun.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Re: Dynafiber booms
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII

My experience with Fiberspar has been bad. Too many swims, sail
repairs, and time waiting for replacement authorization and shipping
(Fiberspar does honor their waranty). As far as their front end, it
takes more than one year to be considered successful. I also don't
like the fact that they use the least reliable method of carbon/epoxy
layup in their masts and booms.

No, I haven't bought a Dynafiber boom the first year they made them. I
am waiting to see how they hold up. A friend of mine is a team rider
for Dynafiber, and has been giving me some feed back on them as well.
The trust comes from the quality of their masts, which have performed
flawlessly. I am anticipating that their booms will have the same
success. But I am taking a wait and see attitude, besides it will
probably be another season before I am ready for a new boom.

Ken, I don't know if that was your first Fiberspar failure last summer,
but after your third failure, you'll probably question their quality.
After five failures*, you would probably do like I did, and clear out
all the Fiberspar out of your quiver.

Respectfully,

~Jim Paugh
_____________________________________________________________________
Jim Paugh email: James.Paugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis
ONC Technologies phone: (415) 336-4466
SunSoft fax: (415) 336-6015
_____________________________________________________________________

* 3 Fiberspar masts, 2 Fiberspar booms

> From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>

> > I switched from Fiberspar to Dynafiber masts and Gulftech booms, and my
> > equipment failures *ended*. My next boom will be a either a Dynafiber
> > or another Gulftech.
>
> You're not willing to trust a Fiberspar boom whose arms are well-proven
> and front-end now has a year's successful track record, but you are willing
> to trust a Dynafiber boom the first year they make them with *no* history
> at all?
>
>
> Ken Poulton
> poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:23 PST