Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA18747; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 14:35:29 -0700 Return-Path: <westes@usc.com-DeleteThis> Received: from uucp5.netcom.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA29136; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 14:35:55 -0700 Received: from localhost by netcomsv.netcom.com with UUCP (8.6.4/SMI-4.1) id OAA16676; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 14:29:26 -0700 Received: by usc.com (NX5.67d/NX3.0M) id AA01567; Wed, 14 Sep 94 14:06:01 -0700 From: Will Estes <westes@usc.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9409142106.AA01567@usc.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: 3rd ave To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Date: Wed, 14 Sep 1994 14:06:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9409141543.tn964898@aol.com-DeleteThis> from "JefWNDHNTR@aol.com-DeleteThis" at Sep 14, 94 12:47:49 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 902
'JefWNDHNTR@aol.com-DeleteThis says:'
> The 3rd avenue parking ticket situation is getting bad. I spoke, as a rep of
> the SFBA, to Sue Lee (249-1200x60) in the City planners dept. Basically,
> they dont like windsurfers, they didnt want to build the access in the first
> place, the BCDC made them do it, they need the revenue, and they eventually
> want to sell the land for development so why would they make improvements.
> Their postion is that WS'ers are sheap because they dont want to spend the
> 4$ for coyote, so the tickets serves them right. Sombody need to pick up the
> fight on this. Any volunteers?
Can we document this position and then make the case to the BCDC that the
city has failed to meet its original obligation? If it worked once, then
why can't that same path work again?
-- Thanks, Will Estes Internet: westes@usc.com-DeleteThis U.S. Computer Saratoga, CA 95070
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:04 PST