Re: A first -- from Farallones to S.F. by kite-boarding

From: JM (fukitsnukin@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 00:26:53 PDT


X-OldHeader: From fukitsnukin@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com  Fri May 28 00:39:40 2004
Return-Path: <fukitsnukin@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id AAA22969 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 28 May 2004 00:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com ([192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id AAA02387 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 28 May 2004 00:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay12-dav9.bay12.hotmail.com [64.4.35.183]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7E8279BA for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 28 May 2004 01:39:39 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 28 May 2004 00:27:04 -0700
Received: from 24.4.217.198 by bay12-dav9.bay12.hotmail.com with DAV; Fri, 28 May 2004 07:27:04 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [24.4.217.198]
X-Originating-Email: [fukitsnukin@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com]
X-Sender: fukitsnukin@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com
From: "JM" <fukitsnukin@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
References: <a0521062abcdc241255ab@[10.9.197.165]>
Subject: Re: A first -- from Farallones to S.F. by kite-boarding
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 00:26:53 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2739.300
Message-ID: <BAY12-DAV99lHiu3fQt00017959@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 May 2004 07:27:04.0520 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CBDEC80:01C44485]


> Great article and feat!

Oh yeah - I'm truly inspired... here's the best quote of the article:
"Sharks were definitely a consideration. But sharks can't fly, and kite-
boarders can"... or is it this one, "In the right conditions, you could
probably cover 100 miles in a day," ??

More ridiculous glorification... woo hoo!
JM

----- Original Message -----
From: "David R. Fielder" <dfielder@cooper.cpmc.org-DeleteThis.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK"
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: A first -- from Farallones to S.F. by kite-boarding

>
> Great article and feat!
>
> Seems as though with similar planning and support a WS trip might be
feasible.
>
> Has anyone done that, or are there wind issues (etc) that make it a more
kite-friendly situation?
>
> Of course, hang-time for avoiding Landlord would be a bit less........
>
> David
>
> >Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:53:01 -0700
> >From: Alain Dumesny <alain@macromedia.com-DeleteThis.com>
> >To: wind_talk <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
> >Subject: A first -- from Farallones to S.F. by kite-boarding
> >Message-ID: <40B6714D.6010001@macromedia.com-DeleteThis.com>
> >
> >
> >In case you haven't seen it...
> >
> >http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/05/27/BAGDV6S72718.DTL
> >
> >
> >--------
> >Alain Dumesny
>

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 5/22/2004



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 26 2005 - 11:57:42 PST