Re: Crissy Wind Readings??

From: B D (windtalkposter@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 14:28:57 PDT 

X-OldHeader: From windtalkposter@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com  Fri May  3 14:28:59 2002
Return-Path: <windtalkposter@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA24923 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 3 May 2002 14:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA20857 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 3 May 2002 14:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hotmail.com (f3.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.3]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F666CF2F for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri,  3 May 2002 15:28:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 3 May 2002 14:28:57 -0700
Received: from 63.251.253.2 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 03 May 2002 21:28:57 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [63.251.253.2]
From: "B D" <windtalkposter@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
Subject: Re: Crissy Wind Readings??
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 14:28:57 -0700
Message-ID: <F3SGfM7QugGlyAs6jn200002871@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2002 21:28:57.0664 (UTC) FILETIME=[88A10400:01C1F2E9]

Isn't it also true that, for a given Crissy wind
reading, you're much better off on an ebb than
a flood, since you have potentially 5-10 kts
more apparent wind and less fog?

Bob Dow

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:05:54 PDT