Re: Re:

From: Michael Lassner (mwlass@home.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 19:35:04 PDT


X-OldHeader: From mwlass@home.com-DeleteThis.com  Thu Oct 11 19:25:43 2001
Return-Path: <mwlass@home.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id TAA15000 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id TAA07434 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.148]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A88C2DCB for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 20:25:43 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from C1794718A ([24.12.14.73]) by femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20011012022537.FSGO28852.femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com@C1794718A> for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:25:37 -0700
Message-ID: <001001c152c6$7fc87390$6701a8c0@C1794718A>
From: "Michael Lassner" <mwlass@home.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
References: <20011011210345.16537.qmail@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
Subject: Re: Re:
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:35:04 -0700
Organization: None
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200


I have a 4 year old zipperless heavy suit. I don't use it that much (about
15 times/year), but it is still in good shape. It is very comfortable for a
heavy wetsuit because it has great freedom of movement in the arms. It is
also very warm.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jarrett McPeek" <jumpjibe@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK"
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:06 PM
Subject: Re:

>
> Well I have mixed experiences with them. First, I find them comfortable
and fairly well designed in that regard. Durability-wise, I'm on my second
(in 3 years). The first held up fine (with a lot of use), and I even sold
it after a couple years. The one I'm using now is holding up noticeabley
less well, with a few minor rips and tears after just a few sessions.
> JM
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Erik Eiseman" <eeiseman@worldnet.att.net-DeleteThis.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
> To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
> Subject:
>
>
> > Does anyone have a smoothy Neil Pryde wetsuit. I'm on my second
> > one. The first one was warrenty replaced after mysterious tears
> > formed in the rubber. not cuts. mostly by the crotch. Now my
> > second one is even worse. Be weary of purchasing neil pryde
> > wetsuits. they don't seem to work. Now I just have a heap of
> > useless rubber after one season.
> >
> > curious if anyone else has had these problems with NP.
> >
> > E
> >
> >
> > [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
> >
> >
>
> --
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:22 PST