(no subject)

From: Lott, Andrew D (andrew.d.lott@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 13:46:17 PDT


X-OldHeader: From andrew.d.lott@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com  Thu Oct 11 14:06:10 2001
Return-Path: <andrew.d.lott@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA29025 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (msgbas2.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.34]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA11846 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw3a.lmco.com (mailgw3a.lmco.com [192.35.35.24]) by msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C84B06 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:06:08 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from emss01g01.ems.lmco.com ([129.197.181.54]) by mailgw3a.lmco.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA06616 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 17:06:03 -0400 (EDT)
Return-Receipt-To: andrew.d.lott@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lmco.com (PMDF V5.2-32 #38886) id <0GL200I017DQ4S@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com> for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emss01i00.ems.lmco.com ([129.197.181.70]) by lmco.com (PMDF V5.2-32 #38886) with ESMTP id <0GL200GE871B1G@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com> for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by emss01i00.ems.lmco.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)	id <4LM4XY5B>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:46:24 -0700
Content-return: allowed
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:46:17 -0700
From: "Lott, Andrew D" <andrew.d.lott@lmco.com-DeleteThis.com>
Subject: RE:
To: "'wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com'" <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Message-id: <A8011EA20676D4119ED400508BE3297E43A468@emss01m13.ems.lmco.com-DeleteThis.com>
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)


I've actually had good luck with my several year old Pryde 4/3 full suit -
less than my previous O'Neills. no problems - I will admit I only have 30
some days on it.

(was probably not made on a Monday or Friday.....)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Eiseman [SMTP:eeiseman@worldnet.att.net-DeleteThis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK
> Subject:
>
> Does anyone have a smoothy Neil Pryde wetsuit. I'm on my second
> one. The first one was warrenty replaced after mysterious tears
> formed in the rubber. not cuts. mostly by the crotch. Now my
> second one is even worse. Be weary of purchasing neil pryde
> wetsuits. they don't seem to work. Now I just have a heap of
> useless rubber after one season.
>
> curious if anyone else has had these problems with NP.
>
> E
>
>
> [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:22 PST