X-OldHeader: From allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com Wed Aug 22 23:53:14 2001 Return-Path: <allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id XAA28163 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 23:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id XAA27349 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 23:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp005.mailsrvcs.net (smtp005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.184]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3215F718 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:53:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from computer (1Cust77.tnt11.sjc4.da.uu.net [63.42.69.77]) by smtp005.mailsrvcs.net with SMTP for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; id f7N6rA724848 Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:53:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <002101c12b9f$da19c180$4d452a3f@computer> From: "Allen H Zimmermann" <allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com> To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> References: <3B8495D8.9090706@mechsys2.me.berkeley.edu-DeleteThis.com> Subject: Re: your offshore accounts Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 23:50:06 -0700 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
I don't mean to open a can of worms, but what about the related subject,
"side offshore"?
----- Original Message -----
From: "J.R. Seven" <seven@mechsys2.me.berkeley.edu-DeleteThis.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK"
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: your offshore accounts
>
> Ken Poulton wrote:
>
> > [spam story]
>
> >
>
> > Or is rejecting messages containing the word "o**shore" too harsh
> > for wind_talk? :-)
>
>
> Hmm, there might be trouble.
>
> When our SUV driving environmentalists want to complain about the
> Administration's policies regarding o**shore oil drilling and their
> messages are filtered out, we'll be accused of censorship...
>
> ...and when someone's warning to a newbie about sailing in an o**shore
> breeze gets rejected and the poor novice goes out and gets blown from
> 3rd to Milpitas and washes up in the treatment plant smelling more
> like a used wetsuit than a used wetsuit, how the lawsuits will pile
> up...
>
> Obviously, what I'm trying to show is that this list should be
> moderated. By a deity. Only trouble is, Robby's too busy sailing.
>
> Some Other JR
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:20 PST