Malicious and Irresponsible?!?!?!

From: Dave Polzer (dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Mon Apr 02 2001 - 08:34:44 PDT


X-OldHeader: From dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis.com  Mon Apr  2 08:29:23 2001
Return-Path: <dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA13019 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA24304 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BEB817 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon,  2 Apr 2001 09:29:22 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from dave (ali-ca30-10.ix.netcom.com [209.110.231.74]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA19990 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:29:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <004301c0bb8a$723f35c0$0300a8c0@dave>
From: "Dave Polzer" <dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis.com>
To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
References: <3AC88F2E.32044957@home.com-DeleteThis.com>
Subject: Malicious and Irresponsible?!?!?!
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:34:44 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200


What ever Dude... I hope that was meant as a joke.

You might as well say that we shouldn't endanger Paramedic's lives by
getting into an autombile accident on the highway and endanger their lives
by requiring medical attention. After all they could die in the process of
helping the injured. ?!?!?

Malicious and irresponsible? Ya right.

You should definately not sail beyond your own personal limitations, but
emergency people are there for a reason. Careful what you preach.. One day
you just might need some help yourself.

Thanks to all those people who do take the time and effort to help those in
need.

I broke my 2 week old mast just shy of the channel last night myself. I swam
half the way and was lucky enough to recieve some towing assistance to make
it back just north of SM Bridge. Had it not been for those two individuals I
would have wound up somewhere near Redwood Shores making for one hell of a
walk back.

Thanks Pierre and Paul.

My 2 cents....

Dave Polzer

-- Original Message -----
From: JR Johnston <jrstudio@home.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: VHF radios

> This radio business all sounds a little malicious and irresposible
> to me. What i can't understand is why would you endanger your life
> & the lifes of others, not to mention the coast guards? Why are you
> going out so far that you can't make it back on your own? Is your
> equipment going to fail because you are to cheap to replace last
> years uni? I understand that equipment can break, even when it is
> brand new, but if you can't swim in -- you shouldn't be there(.)
> Don't endanger your life or the lifes of others, not to mention the
> coast guards!
>
> "Good swimmers are oftenest drowned."
>
> Thomas Fuller Gnomologia, 1732
>
>
> [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:08 PST