RE: How was Waddell?

From: Cliff (cliff@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Tue Aug 15 2000 - 11:35:06 PDT


Return-Path: <cliff@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA11490 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.58]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA21888 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69CB4F6 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:37:06 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from adsl ([63.201.130.142]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id <0FZC00EDWGOPO3@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net-DeleteThis> for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:35:06 -0700
From: Cliff <cliff@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: RE: How was Waddell?
In-reply-to: <NEBBJNIPPKBHHFBHMFMKEEEFCHAA.bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis>
To: Sergei Burkov <bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis>, wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
Cc: george@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis
Reply-To: cliff@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis
Message-id: <002f01c006e7$888e19c0$2901a8c0@pacbell.net-DeleteThis>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)

Sergei,
We consider everything that comes in to us, however due to sheer volume we
cannot respond to every email. Hopefully you understand. We are checking
into the situation with the Waddell sensor. Please note that it is possible
that there is nothing wrong with the sensor. It is on land and cannot
exactly reflect the wind in the sailing area. Sometimes, due to different
meteorological factors, the sensors' readings will vary even more greatly
from the readings in the sailing area.

~George Haye
iWindsurf.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Burkov [mailto:bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 10:08 AM
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
Cc: george@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis
Subject: RE: How was Waddell?

iWindsurf guys!
Are you there?

Waddell sensor is underreporting big time! Please fix it.

I sent two messages regarding this to your feedback@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis or
whatever your webpage recommended. No reply, no thank you, no go to hell, no
nothing. I suspect nobody reads it. Please pay attention.

It's not just a minor inaccuracy, it's a difference between making a long
drive to Waddell or not. Two last Sundays the pager was reporting 17 while
people were screaming on 4.5s.

Sergei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
> [mailto:wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis]On Behalf Of TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 10:20 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: How was Waddell?
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/14/00 11:29:38 AM, bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis writes:
>
> << How was Waddell on Sunday?
> Is pager still underreporting? >>
>
> I was O'pd on a 5.0 @ Dav. on Sunday and it was still blowin hard
> at 6:30.
> Waddelll was just a hair lighter. When I re-packed my stuff from the van
> into the Chinook I had a haunting feeling that the 4.5 I thought I would
> never use that day was going to have the last laugh.
> We veteren shleppers of gear should know better.
> Bring Everything!
>
> btw... The swell is in and the reports look good for the coast tomorrow!
> YaHoo. So if the wind doesn't make it grab your boards and catch
> some surf.
> TD
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:37 PDT