Re: How was Waddell?

From: JR Johnston (jrstudio@home.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Mon Aug 14 2000 - 20:52:26 PDT


Return-Path: <jrstudio@home.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id UAA10665 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 20:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.58]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id UAA19154 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 20:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.rdc1.sfba.home.com (mail2.rdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.0.75]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ED517F for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 21:51:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from home.com ([24.14.149.219]) by mail2.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20000816035156.OFRQ6679.mail2.rdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com-DeleteThis> for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 20:51:56 -0700
Message-ID: <3998BE28.1F13D16@home.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:52:26 -0700
From: JR Johnston <jrstudio@home.com-DeleteThis>
Organization: @home
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: How was Waddell?
References: <NEBBJNIPPKBHHFBHMFMKEEEFCHAA.bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It's true. We we're there on two dayslast week and it read 17 and I was on my
5.3 wound, so figure 22 or 23.

Sergei Burkov wrote:

> iWindsurf guys!
> Are you there?
>
> Waddell sensor is underreporting big time! Please fix it.
>
> I sent two messages regarding this to your feedback@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis or
> whatever your webpage recommended. No reply, no thank you, no go to hell, no
> nothing. I suspect nobody reads it. Please pay attention.
>
> It's not just a minor inaccuracy, it's a difference between making a long
> drive to Waddell or not. Two last Sundays the pager was reporting 17 while
> people were screaming on 4.5s.
>
> Sergei
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
> > [mailto:wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis]On Behalf Of TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis
> > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 10:20 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list
> > Subject: Re: How was Waddell?
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 8/14/00 11:29:38 AM, bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis writes:
> >
> > << How was Waddell on Sunday?
> > Is pager still underreporting? >>
> >
> > I was O'pd on a 5.0 @ Dav. on Sunday and it was still blowin hard
> > at 6:30.
> > Waddelll was just a hair lighter. When I re-packed my stuff from the van
> > into the Chinook I had a haunting feeling that the 4.5 I thought I would
> > never use that day was going to have the last laugh.
> > We veteren shleppers of gear should know better.
> > Bring Everything!
> >
> > btw... The swell is in and the reports look good for the coast tomorrow!
> > YaHoo. So if the wind doesn't make it grab your boards and catch
> > some surf.
> > TD
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:37 PDT