Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (root@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA20547 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 01:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com (hplms26.hpl.hp.com [15.255.168.31]) by opus.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA13991 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 01:17:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.51]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id BAA03718 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 01:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from utcpoqli ([12.72.64.183]) by mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122) with SMTP id <20000406081514.XAPN12683.mtiwmhc26.worldnet.att.net@utcpoqli> for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 08:15:14 +0000 Message-ID: <000901a8ea6e$5a63a4e0$b740480c@utcpoqli> Reply-To: "Erik Eiseman" <eeiseman@worldnet.att.net-DeleteThis> From: "Erik Eiseman" <eeiseman@worldnet.att.net-DeleteThis> To: <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: Crissy Beach & Rigging Area? Date: Fri, 4 Jan 1980 05:42:58 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
The details are true. The beach is eroding, the grass is dead. Pave it all
and leave the tourists behind and sail. Ahh, freedom.
But seriously, the above is correct, but on the positive, it's better than
an air strip, birds have returned to a naturally flowing estuary where one
once stood long ago. It was an attempt well made, but needs help now, I
personally havn't seen grass hold up at any other rigging sites. Something
will work out. How about that checkerd concrete blocks. Does any one know
what the next step is. Put sailors to work on windless days. The beach
erosion is surely due to natural unknown forces of water and the new estuary
It needs to be evaluated by someone with experience and resituated. The
sand will be back in a second, once done. There was a posting about the
sign where windsurfers can park. Thanks, but also doesn't work. Too long-
How about ON WINDY DAYS NON WINDSURFERS PLEASE PARK TO THE RIGHT.
WINSURFERS TO YOU LEFT. THANKS FOR YOUR COOPERATION. ENJOY.
First attempt was made- great things were done, some didn't work.
What's next?
-----Original Message-----
From: George Haye <geohaye@hotmail.com-DeleteThis>
To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 7:14 PM
Subject: Crissy Beach & Rigging Area?
>Crissy Sailors -- what the heck is that place lookin' like?
>
>I received a report from one of the best and most well-known Crissy sailors
>which stated that the rigging / parking areas are not coming around
>according to plan, at all. The turf is said to be "dead" and there is
>apparantly reason to worry about whether this plan was a good one or not.
>And, the beach is evidently eroding substantially thanks to the new seawall
>(?). Evidently the beach erosion is unearthing crap that's been covered up
>for decades. Sounds like a pretty serious situation. Should we continue to
>remain calm as the GGNRA tells us, or is there something quite wrong that
>requires are input/action?
>
>Any info is appreciated.
>
>-George
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:02 PDT