Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (root@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA13888 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:25:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com (hplms26.hpl.hp.com [15.255.168.31]) by opus.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA11919 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:25:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com-DeleteThis [24.0.0.66]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id PAA17603 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:25:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from home.com ([24.12.57.232]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <20000327232403.ETKX5721.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com-DeleteThis> for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:24:03 -0800 Message-ID: <38DFEDFB.6224C0FC@home.com-DeleteThis> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:25:48 -0800 From: Bob Galvan <kasplash@home.com-DeleteThis> Organization: @Home Network X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61C-CCK-MCD AtHome0407 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Custom Board Suggestions References: <1B0E6136EE54D31180930090279895DAD4E02E@sabamail.saba.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Jeff Milum wrote:
>
> Does anyone have comparative experience riding the Naish 8-5 vs. the JP 255
> Wave?
>
> I've ridden the Naish and heard great things about the JP, but have yet to
> find anyone who can comment on them comparatively.
Yes.
I found the naish to be/feel thicker and narrower, more domed deck,
'slashier',
the jp flatter decked, wider, thinner and 'floatier', especially in the air.
I preferred the JP, and was jumping like crazy on it, and landing soooft!
kasplash@home.com-DeleteThis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:23:58 PDT