Re: SFO Mitigation - New Windsurf Site?

From: Jim Paugh (James.Paugh@Sun.COM-DeleteThis)
Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 18:59:16 PST


Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (root@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA04889 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com (hplms26.hpl.hp.com [15.255.168.31]) by opus.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA05684 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:59:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lukla.Sun.COM (lukla.Sun.COM [192.18.98.31]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id SAA21310 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sunmail1.Sun.COM ([129.145.1.2]) by lukla.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11875 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:59:25 -0700 (MST)
Received: from jurassic.eng.sun.com (jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.86.31]) by sunmail1.Sun.COM (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1/ENSMAIL,v1.6.1-sunmail1) with ESMTP id SAA07487 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Sun.COM (awe174-34.AWE.Sun.COM [192.29.174.34]) by jurassic.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02756 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: James.Paugh@eng.sun.com-DeleteThis
Message-ID: <3898EF04.E6658C17@Sun.COM-DeleteThis>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 18:59:16 -0800
From: Jim Paugh <James.Paugh@Sun.COM-DeleteThis>
Organization: Sun Microsystems
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: SFO Mitigation - New Windsurf Site?
References: <2.c095dc.25ca3537@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis wrote:
>
> - Wind that is not offshore for safety (ideally side shore)

Wind can't be straght onshore either. The wind direction relative to the
shoreline should be specified in degrees.

-- 
~Jim Paugh



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:23:47 PDT