Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA064884335; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:38:55 -0800 Return-Path: <bjames@exponent.com-DeleteThis> Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA004094330; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:38:50 -0800 Received: from menlomail.exponent.com (unknown-107-17.exponent.com [198.70.107.17]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id LAA06376 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:38:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by MENLOMAIL.exponent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id <D5DQ15L6>; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:36:18 -0800 Message-Id: <6717C84A8642D2119F1700A0C9D5D9F40C5EA0@MENLOMAIL.exponent.com-DeleteThis> From: Brad James <bjames@exponent.com-DeleteThis> To: "'wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis'" <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Coyote Wind Blockage Calcs Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:36:16 -0800 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hey guys-
I work for Failure Analysis Associates, and just talked to one of my
colleages who is a Ph.D. civil/ structural engineer whose specialty is
windloading/blockage studies and calcs. Although he gets paid by people to
do this stuff, he's told me he'd be happy to donate a *little* time to look
over the building peoples' wind tunnel testing/methodology for us.
I haven't had much time to review all of the emails regarding these
buildings by Coyote.... Do we have access to all of these reports? If so,
forward them to me, and I'll get my buddy to review them. Hopefully, we can
find some points to refute the 10% reduction claim.
Brad
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:01 PST