Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA091725333; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:02:13 -0700 Return-Path: <dfielder@cooper.cpmc.org-DeleteThis> Received: from gate.cpmc.org (firewall-user@gate.cpmc.org-DeleteThis [205.226.130.2]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id RAA22564 for <wind_talk@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gate.cpmc.org; id RAA18441; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown(10.8.49.47) by gate.cpmc.org via smap (V3.1.1) id xma018384; Tue, 4 Aug 98 16:59:58 -0700 Message-Id: <v02140b04b1ed4b7e6ebf@[10.8.49.47]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 16:59:10 -0700 To: wind_talk@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis From: dfielder@cooper.cpmc.org-DeleteThis (David R. Fielder) Subject: Weather Question
Does anyone have simple/clear explanation (not just el nino) for why the
"old standby" of a fog bank at the Golden Gate and hot inland didn't
produce nice steady afternoon winds last Saturday at Berkeley or Pt.
Isabel??
Thanks in advance...
David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:02:08 PST