Received: from hplabs.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.18/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA091582327; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:18:47 -0700 Return-Path: <kasplash@crl.com-DeleteThis> Received: from mail.crl.com by hplabs.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.20/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1SU) id AA062092325; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:18:45 -0700 Received: from crl7.crl.com by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA25152 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>); Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:10:06 -0700 Received: by crl7.crl.com id AA10777 (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis); Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:08:42 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Bob Galvan <kasplash@crl.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Cannon Beach Oregon requires sailboarders to be licensed In-Reply-To: <0001DFAA.1264@ccsmtp.wj.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970708100605.10710B-100000@crl7.crl.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Geoffrey Boehm wrote:
> So, exactly how far from shore does a city have jurisdiction in
> Oregon, or California for that matter?
>
and who's going to enforce?
will there be a "lifeguard" checking stickers on every board heading to
the water?
I think not. Or not for long, anyway.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:32:09 PST