Received: from hpoclrf.sj.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA09340; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 07:25:23 -0800 Return-Path: <kirk@hpmsd3.sj.hp.com-DeleteThis> Received: by hpmsd3.sj.hp.com (1.37.109.8/15.5+IOS 3.22) id AA14010; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 07:30:16 -0800 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 07:30:16 -0800 From: Kirk Lindstrom <kirk@hpmsd3.sj.hp.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9411171530.AA14010@hpmsd3.sj.hp.com-DeleteThis> To: westes@usc.com-DeleteThis, wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Re: Dynafiber booms Cc: kwinner@BIX.com-DeleteThis
> If you get the DynaFiber booms, please post a summary to the net. Once I
> work off my FiberSnaps, I think DynaFiber is my next buy.
> Thanks,
> Will Estes Internet: westes@usc.com-DeleteThis
>
Why?
Fiberspar was very good about their warranty PLUS I've got a full season
on my '94 (about 76 days not counting Maui) and I often sail way
overpowered on sinkers so I can get back when it dies and my Fiberspar
has held up like a champ. The 6 I broke before I got their '94 lasted
about 18-22 sessions before snapping. I'd say that Fiberspar deserves
out busisness until someone can show a better product with better
reliability for the same price...or the same product features for a
lower price.
Kirk out
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:22 PST