GEM vs Windance EPX ?

From: TONG_PAUL@Tandem.COM-DeleteThis
Date: Tue Jun 28 1994 - 15:42:00 PDT 

Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA09223; Wed, 29 Jun 1994 23:40:25 -0700
Return-Path: <TONG_PAUL@Tandem.COM-DeleteThis>
Received: from comm.cpd.tandem.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA00072; Wed, 29 Jun 1994 23:40:25 -0700
Received: by comm.Tandem.COM (4.10/4.5) id AA28473; 29 Jun 94 23:41:42 +1700
Date: 29 Jun 94 15:42:00 +1700
From: TONG_PAUL@Tandem.COM-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <199406292341.AA28473@comm.Tandem.COM-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: GEM vs Windance EPX ?

I am thinking about purchasing either a 1993 GEM 8'6" high wind slalom
or a 1992 Windance 8'6" EPX. I'm 165# and wondering if anyone on the
net has experience with either of these boards and how they work at
Crissy/3rd Ave. I'm mostly concerned with the shapes and how the
boards handle/jump in 4.0 to 5.2

Please reply directly to me at tong_paul@tandem.com-DeleteThis if you don't want
to post to the entire net. Thanks, Paul

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:27:45 PST