X-OldHeader: From daddy@ilovemaggie.co.uk-DeleteThis.com Sun Aug 31 13:04:06 2003 Return-Path: <daddy@ilovemaggie.co.uk-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id NAA01082 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:04:06 -0700 (PDT) From: daddy@ilovemaggie.co.uk-DeleteThis.com Received: from msgbas2x.net.asiapac.agilent.com ([192.168.216.27]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id NAA19789 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from another.com (www.funmail.co.uk [212.62.7.9]) by msgbas2x.net.asiapac.agilent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 443778D1 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 04:03:32 +0800 (SGP) Received: (qmail 29879 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2003 20:01:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www-a25) (172.16.100.25) by qm-a01 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2003 20:01:55 -0000 Message-ID: <1285509.1062360184787.JavaMail.root@172.16.100.50-DeleteThis.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:03:03 +0100 (BST) To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com Subject: Re: sail repair X-Funmail-UID: 1605905 X-Senders-IP: unknown
That sounds right.
-----Original Message----- From : Allen H Zimmermann
<allen.zimmermann@gte.net-DeleteThis.com> To : Multiple recipients of list
WIND_TALK <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> Date : 30 August 2003
19:57:52 Subject : Re: sail repair
>Leading Edge is the name Will is the owner 650-347-0795 >-----
Original Message ----- >From: <daddy@ilovemaggie.co.uk-DeleteThis.com> >To:
\223Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK\223
><wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> >Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003
10:58 PM >Subject: Re: sail repair > > >> Before two years ago
when I switched to wave sails that are more >> durable I had work
done by the sail loft near coyote point on the >> other side of hwy
101 from ASD. Sailmakers sounds like the >> company's name. >> >>
They did great work, very professional service. the prices were not
>> cheap but I kept coming back because they did good work. I had a
>> top strap re sewn for about $30 and a panel replaced for $80. >>
Really good work. >> >> Also Harriet's sail repair on Taylor in SF.
She does good work but >> took longer. >> >> Kevin -----Original
Message----- From : Peter McColgan >> <plumeria@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com> To :
Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK >>
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> Date : 29 August 2003 09:06:21 >>
Subject : Re: sail repair >> >> >I would definitely not recommend
West Marine in Mountain View. >> They did >a horrible job on
repairing my sail which set me back >> about $40.. >probably could
have done better myself if I had a >> sewing machine :-) >Just
shoddy workmanship and it looked crap. > >> >peter > >Richard
Zimmerman wrote: >> >> So now that Sutter has >> closed down, where
is a good place to have a >> sail repaired? >> >> >> -- >> >>
---------------- >> Learn about SFIA's Plan to fill the >> Bay >>
<http://www.ProtectOurBay.com> at my web site >> >>
<windrider@ProtectOurBay.com-DeleteThis.com> >> >> \\223The wild things of this >>
earth are not ours to do with as we please. >> They have been given
>> to us in trust, and we must account for them to >> the
generations >> which will come after us and audit our accounts.\\223
>> -- William >> T. Hornaday > >> >> -- Personalised email by
http://another.com >> > >
-- Personalised email by http://another.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 26 2005 - 11:57:15 PST