San Luis Weeds

From: Bruce Hochuli (bhochuli@cisco.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 15:33:31 PDT 

X-OldHeader: From bhochuli@cisco.com-DeleteThis.com  Mon Jul  8 15:36:26 2002
Return-Path: <bhochuli@cisco.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id PAA05479 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com [141.183.101.235]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id PAA09964 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com [171.71.163.10]) by msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901A2448 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue,  9 Jul 2002 06:36:23 +0800 (SGP)
Received: from nisser.cisco.com (nisser.cisco.com [171.71.176.85]) by sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g68MaLpj021238 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BHOCHULI-W2K.cisco.com (dhcp-171-69-39-207.cisco.com [171.69.39.207]) by nisser.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id PAA08497; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020708152812.01683a28@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com-DeleteThis.com>
X-Sender: bhochuli@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com-DeleteThis.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 15:33:31 -0700
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
From: Bruce Hochuli <bhochuli@cisco.com-DeleteThis.com>
Subject: San Luis Weeds
Cc: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D08BEC0.1101F96D@xilinx.com-DeleteThis.com>

Hi All,

There was an earlier inquiry about the weeds at San Luis. They are now a
fact. At lower water levels (<219), you absolutely need a weed fin. At the
higher levels, you might get away with a short slalom or surf fin but not
for long. Every regular was sailing a weed fin over the weekend.

On the other hand, the weeds are a joy to hit at speed with a weed fin
because the water is totally flat in the heavy weeds and you just blast
through them. You want to fall somewhere else, though.

Bruce

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:05:55 PDT