X-OldHeader: From davidotto@web.de-DeleteThis.com Sat Dec 1 12:47:27 2001 Return-Path: <davidotto@web.de-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id MAA08184 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas2.sgp.agilent.com (msgbas2.sgp.agilent.com [141.183.101.231]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id MAA06148 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:47:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp02.web.de [217.72.192.151]) by msgbas2.sgp.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617E619A for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 04:47:50 +0800 (SGP) Received: from [213.7.15.19] (helo=claranet) by smtp.web.de with smtp (Exim 3.32 #26) id 16AH2T-0000ku-00 for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:47:09 +0100 From: "David Otto" <davidotto@web.de-DeleteThis.com> To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> Subject: Streamlined or Chinook Base Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 21:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <MABBLCEGGOFHGEMOLONFMEKICBAA.davidotto@web.de-DeleteThis.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Hi,
which one do you think has the better durability? The Streamlined/WSH
twist-on base or the Chinook twist-on? Can't decide.
David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:24 PST