X-OldHeader: From TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis.com Sat May 26 08:45:10 2001 Return-Path: <TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA24047 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 26 May 2001 08:45:10 -0700 (PDT) From: TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis.com Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA25508 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 26 May 2001 08:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imo-m04.mx.aol.com (imo-m04.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.7]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17729346 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:45:09 -0600 (MDT) Received: from TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id v.64.e661bbd (3699) for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 26 May 2001 11:44:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <64.e661bbd.28412974@aol.com-DeleteThis.com> Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:44:52 EDT Subject: Re: RE:SFO voters to decide for entire Bay Area? To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Mac sub 28
In a message dated 5/24/01 8:55:34 AM, TPierce@goldengate.org-DeleteThis.com writes:
<< Why should the city of SF decide this issue? While the people of SF may
have far more valuable opinions than do the other residents of the Bay Area,
and while the city of SF owns SFO airport, it's still NOT their bay!! >>
Its probably the best shot at stopping the landfill. Politics isn't fair,
its a compromise, but looking at the reality of the problem, The SF
Supervisors and the SF constituency are more likely to vote to put a hold on
the landfill than peninsula voters. This is my opinion, however, but look at
the history of issues and their outcomes. In addition, the battleground
would be focused and more susceptible to grass roots lobbying.
TD
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:12 PST