RE: Iwindsurf.com detailed graphs and area averages are off ?

From: rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 08:32:03 PDT


X-OldHeader: From rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com  Tue May  8 08:32:27 2001
Return-Path: <rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA11848 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 8 May 2001 08:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com
Received: from msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com [141.183.101.235]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id IAA29249 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 8 May 2001 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sinclair-rm2.norwest.com (sinclair-rm2.norwest.com [198.74.16.148]) by msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C2B0F161 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue,  8 May 2001 23:32:17 +0800 (SGP)
Received: from talia.norwest.com by sinclair-rm2.norwest.com via smtpd (for msgbas1x.sgp.agilent.com [192.25.42.26]) with SMTP; 8 May 2001 15:32:17 UT
Received: from whitestar.norwest.com (whitestar.norwest.com [198.74.20.10]) by talia.norwest.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f48FWE400856 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 8 May 2001 10:32:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.15.87.215] by whitestar.norwest.com via smtpd (for talia.norwest.com [198.74.20.148]) with SMTP; 8 May 2001 15:32:14 UT
Received: from xcgi-calax-01.wellsfargo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unixm4.wellsfargo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA07230 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 8 May 2001 08:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xcgi-calax-01.wellsfargo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <K24L0TNJ>; Tue, 8 May 2001 08:32:12 -0700
Message-ID: <583643968681D4119D170001FA7EEA810301EEC1@xcem-casfo-04.wellsfargo.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
Subject: RE: Iwindsurf.com detailed graphs and area averages are off ?
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 08:32:03 -0700 
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)


On Item #2 below--I like it! Why do you think it's hard to read? I
especially like the little arrows showing direction.

On Item #1 below--my first thought is maybe it's different like the pager
will be different when the current reading drops into the first history
slot. It's often not the same, and I think it's because it takes a new
average over a slightly different period of time.

Cindoll

-----Original Message-----
From: Alain Dumesny [mailto:alain@macromedia.com-DeleteThis.com]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 6:16 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK
Subject: Iwindsurf.com detailed graphs and area averages are off ?

#1) So I started running into this a couple days ago and wonder if anyone
else seeing this.

on the iwindsurf main page (graph or chart)
http://www.iwindsurf.com/windandwhere.iws?regionID=126&geographicalAreaID=4
you get links saying that say coyote is at 18, yet when you jump to the
site detailed page

http://www.iwindsurf.com/windandwhere.iws?regionID=126&geographicalAreaID=4&
siteID=211

you get the time heading saying it is av18 gusting 22 but many times I have
seen the actual chart showing some *very* different number (more like 14-15
ave) for times that seem to line up.

Question: is the textural link with the time correct (and mroe real time)
whereas the bar chart the average for that 15 minutes span ?

I just don't undertand why they are so much off soemthing - makes you
wonder which number to trust, or to trust the readings at all....

Note: I've used the web site for the last couple years and never ran into
this problem before.

#2 the main wind map page (that got changed a few weeks ago) is really hard
to read.
http://www.iwindsurf.com/windandwhere.iws?regionID=126&geographicalAreaID=4&
snapShotBar=snapShot
WAY too many info to be able to read it. It's hard to see where the arrow,
the wind speed and name connect (let alone a bunch of iw icons). With all
future/over land site this makes it really hard to read too.

What was wrong with teh old one ?

#3
http://www.iwindsurf.com/windandwhere.iws?regionID=126&geographicalAreaID=4&
snapShotBar=snapShot
has waddell, but is missing Natural briges. South bay coast viewers really
need them both. By conparaison san luis and sherman are listed evern though
they are way off the real map (but still useful to have).

--- Alain.

-- 
*------------------------------------------------------------------*
Alain Dumesny
UI Lead & Principal Engineer - Macromedia, Dreamweaver project
alain@macromedia.com-DeleteThis.com
http://www.dreamcentral.com/people/alain
Ph: 650-481-4527



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:10 PST