Re: SFO Runways

• Next message: Jeff Milum: "RE: SFO Runways"
• Previous message: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com: "SFO Runways"
• In reply to: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com: "SFO Runways"
• Next in thread: Jeff Milum: "RE: SFO Runways"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

X-OldHeader: From james@farne.stanford.edu-DeleteThis.com  Thu Feb  1 17:25:01 2001
Return-Path: <james@farne.stanford.edu-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id RAA24195 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.58]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id RAA22582 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kana.stanford.edu (kana.Stanford.EDU [171.64.168.250]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799CB7DB for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 18:25:00 -0700 (MST)
Received: from sep.stanford.edu (skye.Stanford.EDU [171.64.168.54]) by kana.stanford.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA83880 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: james@farne.stanford.edu-DeleteThis.com
Message-ID: <3A7A0C6B.A336E78E@sep.stanford.edu-DeleteThis.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 17:24:59 -0800
From: James Rickett <james@farne.stanford.edu-DeleteThis.com>
Reply-To: james@farne.stanford.edu-DeleteThis.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-0.26 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
Subject: Re: SFO Runways
References: <a3.114e1e27.27ab6229@aol.com-DeleteThis.com>

I saw this article in today's Chronicle.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/02/01/MNS180800.DTL

A new report confirms what seems obvious...
SFO did not fully consider alternatives to bay-fill.

Unfortunately it looks like there may be a new politician on the airport
expansion scene too. To quote from the article...

"According to the Los Angeles Times,
 however, the Bush administration plans to
 speed construction of additional runways
 at major airports across the country by
 expediting reviews of their environmental
 impact. "

James Rickett

• Next message: Jeff Milum: "RE: SFO Runways"
• Previous message: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com: "SFO Runways"
• In reply to: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com: "SFO Runways"
• Next in thread: Jeff Milum: "RE: SFO Runways"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:05 PST