X-OldHeader: From dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis Sat Dec 16 01:39:43 2000 Return-Path: <dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id BAA00428 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.58]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id BAA17181 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:39:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E506AB for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 02:39:42 -0700 (MST) Received: from c1129124a ([24.19.155.166]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id <0G5N0005UMQXHN@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net-DeleteThis> for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:37:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 01:39:21 -0800 From: Dave Polzer <dpolzer@pacbell.net-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: You're JR (re My SFBA eNews Editorial) To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis Message-id: <001501c06744$11a2e8a0$a69b1318@smateo1.sfba.home.com-DeleteThis> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 References: <20001216041958.4289.qmail@web5201.mail.yahoo.com-DeleteThis> X-Priority: 3
Don't be so damn politically correct my friend... stand behind yourself and
say what you mean... even if we don't agree on something it doesn't mean we
can't all get along along and share the wonderful joys of beg fellow
windsurfers... all in all in the end.....It's all good.
I miss ya dude... pray for wind... and here's to a fantastic windy season to
come.
Prost, Nazdravi, Cheers, Salute!!! and any other greeting I couldn't
come up with and I hope to see ya soon.
Dave polzer
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Haye" <geohaye@yahoo.com-DeleteThis>
To: "Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK"
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 8:28 PM
Subject: You're JR (re My SFBA eNews Editorial)
>
> JR,
> Regarding my political comment in the SFBA eNews -
> You are right, and thanks for stirring the waters. I
> was over the top including that political editorial in
> the SFBA eNews. The last thing we need to do is to
> cause divisions. I will make sure to get that right in
> the future.
>
> Good wind,
> ~George Haye
> SFBA
>
>
> -ORIGINAL MESSAGE-
>
> I would like to stir up the waters slightly by making
> another small
> suggestion about the content of our promotional
> material.
>
> > SAN FRANCISCO BOARDSAILING ASSOCIATION
> <http://www.sfba.org/>
> > SFBAeNews by George Haye <geohaye@yahoo.com-DeleteThis>
> >
> > [...snip...]
> >
> > 3. GOOD ELECTION NEWS - THE VOTES ARE COUNTED HERE!
> > Many folks concerned about the environment, clean
> water, clean air,
> > and San Francisco Bay were angered by the spineless
> U.S. Supreme
> > Court majority and their decision to not fully count
> the votes for
> > U.S. President this time around...
> >
> > [...etc...]
>
> Although few of them are within the San Francisco city
> limits, there
> are quite a few people out there who believe
> otherwise, feeling that
> the counting of questionable votes is inappropriate.*
> Although we may
> disagree with them on this issue, we could really use
> their support!
> They have money, they have influence, and they have
> good reasons
> (traffic, taxes, noise, etc.) to support our cause. I
> would suggest
> that we should be careful not to alienate this segment
> of the community
> by appearing as just another partisan political group.
> Our concerns
> include everyone, even `them.'
>
> >> Now, go out and shred!
>
> On that we can all agree!
>
>
> JR
>
>
> * Before everyone begins flaming me on election
> issues, please note that
> I do not necessarily agree with the Supreme Court's
> decision, nor with
> the deliberately biased plans suggested by both
> campaigns. I had
> hoped for a more fair and less partisan solution,
> regardless of the
> outcome. Locally, we still have time to build a
> nonpartisan coalition
> over this issue -- can we do better than they have
> done?
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
> http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:55 PDT