Return-Path: <RZM1@pge.com-DeleteThis> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA26132 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA08428 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from can01new.pge.com (can01new.pge.com [131.89.128.10]) by msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A0184 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 11:17:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from dns00.pge.com (dns00 [131.89.128.66]) by can01new.pge.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA00268 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dns04.comp.pge.com by dns00.pge.com (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-4.1) id KAA21672; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange01.comp.pge.com by dns04.comp.pge.com (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-4.1) id KAA20974; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by exchange01.comp.pge.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <QD1B5M7Y>; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:14:04 -0700 Message-ID: <D9CB5ADB95A6D311A7A300805F8BA0D4021CDCF7@exchange04.comp.pge.com-DeleteThis> From: "Martyn, Rick" <RZM1@pge.com-DeleteThis> To: "'wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis'" <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis> Subject: RE: Conditions/Sharks Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:14:04 -0700 Return-Receipt-To: "Martyn, Rick" <RZM1@pge.com-DeleteThis> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain
I believe anything north of Waddell on the coast is San Mateo until you
reach the SF city/county limit.
> ----------
> From: Earl Armas[SMTP:eaarmas@cisco.com-DeleteThis]
> Reply To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 10:03 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: RE: Conditions/Sharks
>
> Interesting... this states that were at 11 attacks
> in San Mateo with 2 fatalities. Any idea where in
> San Mateo this happened? Does San Mateo have a coast?
>
> E
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
> > [mailto:wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis]On Behalf Of Ed Scott
> > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 12:44 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list
> > Subject: Re: Conditions/Sharks
> >
> >
> > Sorry, one more thing, this link has the California geographic
> > distribution of hits:
> >
> > http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/Sharks/statistics/GAttack/mapCA.htm
> >
> > -Ed
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:41 PDT