Re: Help my SFO letter

From: Ed Scott (edscott@best.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 13:45:55 PDT


Return-Path: <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id NAA09366 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 18 May 2000 13:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cosrel1.hp.com (cosrel1.hp.com [15.88.192.10]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id NAA13136 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 18 May 2000 13:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out2.apple.com (mail-out2.apple.com [17.254.0.51]) by cosrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DB6314 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 18 May 2000 14:49:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out2.apple.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA09255 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 18 May 2000 13:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scv3.apple.com (scv3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id <T118064e11264c40dd746a@mailgate1.apple.com-DeleteThis> for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 18 May 2000 13:49:29 -0700
Received: from [17.197.20.103] (scoted2.apple.com [17.197.20.103]) by scv3.apple.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07021 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 18 May 2000 13:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200005182049.NAA07021@scv3.apple.com-DeleteThis>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 4.5 (0410)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 13:45:55 -0700
Subject: Re: Help my SFO letter
From: "Ed Scott" <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
X-Priority: 3
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Tigers, and sometimes, Genentech are both unusable at low tides. I know the
inside cove at Tigers becomes a mudlflat on around a 1.5 ft or less tide.
Genentech is less so, but much the same thing. It's almost all mudflat if
you drew a line from just inside Pt. San Bruno (?) to the beginning of the
first cove where Tigers begins (where the old pier was with the yellow
crane).

I haven't been there recently, but if I recall correctly, there's a gated
entrance to an employee parking lot, I think the turn off for Tigers was
just before there on the left, so the launch was somewhere right in front of
the fuel tanks. I could be all wet on this one. If you've sailed over
there from Oyster, a great launch would be in front of the United hanger
where there's a long sand/rock beach. There's one of those dolphin-type
channel markers right near there, and it's OK on low tide. 'Course this
will all be gone after a runway expansion.

-Ed

----------
>From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis
>To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>
>Subject: Help my SFO letter
>Date: Thu, May 18, 2000, 12:39 PM
>

> I'm working on a last chance letter for SFO before the 5/19 closing on
> comments. I'm tring to classify which sites are already difficult or unusable
> low tide. I said No for Coyote and Candlestick and Yes for Third, Palo Alto,
> Embassy. What about Tigers, Genentech and Oyster? I don't recall having had
> trouble at Oyster but any opinion appreciated. I still also would love to
> know if Old Tigers is across the road from what is now Fed Ex.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:16 PDT