Re: Regional Airport -- Lucy Stern hearings

From: Greg Harris (harris@skolar.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Mon May 08 2000 - 10:59:07 PDT


Return-Path: <harris@skolar.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA22039 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 8 May 2000 10:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cosrel1.hp.com (cosrel1.hp.com [15.88.192.10]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA23110 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 8 May 2000 10:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.Stanford.EDU (smtp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.23]) by cosrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AA5733 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon,  8 May 2000 11:57:13 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from skolar.com (SHINEL-DellD-GAH.Stanford.EDU [171.65.52.144]) by smtp.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA24503 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 8 May 2000 10:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3917006B.7CE366C9@skolar.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 10:59:07 -0700
From: Greg Harris <harris@skolar.com-DeleteThis>
Organization: e-Skolar
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Regional Airport -- Lucy Stern hearings
References: <e8.40a1959.26470746@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Does anyone have any idea what it would take to get a regional transportation
authority.... that actually has some, well, authority? It would seem like
there are a lot of people who who would support such an entity with the way
that the bay area's transportation is presently.

gh

CoyoteSurf@aol.com-DeleteThis wrote:

> The reason that SFO is not proposing a regional airport is because they are
> not a regional authority, which is the thing that is desparately needed.
>
> The airport is a business run by the City.
>
> Many people raise the regional issue, and it falls in the same category as
> many of the others -- "Divide and conquer."
>
> Yes, the man who proposed the north bay airport is a land owner of some of
> the land, but more importantly, his property, although being used for
> farming, is categorized by all the appropriate governmental agencies (the
> authorized agents for you, me, and all of us) as wet lands. Someday, it
> needs to be returned to true wet land use.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:12 PDT