re Reply Addressees (was Re: subscribe digest)

• Next message: Claude Waledisch: "RE: Attention: List Server Group renamed to "Personal_Health_Care"
• Previous message: Ken Poulton: "Re: subscribe digest"
• In reply to: Brian Land: "subscribe digest"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA121924398; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 07:06:38 -0800
Return-Path: <ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA016324397; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 07:06:37 -0800
Received: from wenet.net (tod.wenet.net [216.64.144.163]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id HAA29503 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 07:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tpierce2 (cvx01-250.sfo.wenet.net [206.169.248.250]) by wenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA13909 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 06:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <001001bf279d$eabdf6d0$6e030a0a@goldengate.org-DeleteThis>
From: "Tracy Pierce" <ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
To: <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
References: <E085D44EAB89D311B6370090271E030426D333@ziege.channelpoint.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: re Reply Addressees (was Re: subscribe digest)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 06:55:38 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

I agree with CINDOLL, "Something's changed." Using M$ LookOutExpress
(sorry, no choice for the moment), hitting "Reply to all" now gets me two
addressees, which are
"wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis"
AND
"Multiple recpients of list"
which is of course the same email address.

We all know M$ Outlook thinks it's a lot smarter than it really is, but
isn't there a way to make this work nicely?

Tracy (email dummy) Pierce
,
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Land <bland@channelpoint.com-DeleteThis>
To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 4:14 PM
Subject: subscribe digest

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rossb@wellsfargo.com-DeleteThis [mailto:rossb@wellsfargo.com-DeleteThis]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 10:55 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: RE: Reply-To in Windtalk
>
>
> I used to be able to hit my reply-all button and get the original sender
> plus the group. Then I'd delete the group and send my reply only to the
> originator. Now I don't get the originator's address automatically.
> Something changed. (My solution is to key in the individual's address, of
> course.)
>
> CINDOLL
>

• Next message: Claude Waledisch: "RE: Attention: List Server Group renamed to "Personal_Health_Care"
• Previous message: Ken Poulton: "Re: subscribe digest"
• In reply to: Brian Land: "subscribe digest"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:19 PST