Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA130798106; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 07:41:46 -0700 Return-Path: <Leo_Bragagnolo@sfport.com-DeleteThis> Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA174708105; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 07:41:45 -0700 Received: from golden_gate.sfport.com (sfport-dmz.ci.sf.ca.us [209.77.149.22]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with SMTP id HAA11089 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 07:41:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo_Bragagnolo@sfport.com-DeleteThis Received: by golden_gate.sfport.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.4 (830.2 3-23-1999)) id 88256800.0050A954 ; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 07:41:02 -0700 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: SFPORT To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Message-Id: <88256800.0050A86B.00@golden_gate.sfport.com-DeleteThis> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 07:38:56 -0700 Subject: Re: LASIK Surgery? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
I've heard of a recently developed alternative to LASIK that involves inserting
a plastic disk behind your eye that acts to physically refocus your eye. The
advantage to this is that the process is reversible/modifiable and elimination
of the starburst effect. I don't have any idea how easy it would be to displace
the insert, or if the process has been approved yet in the U.S. Anyone else
have information?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:13 PST