Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA295334526; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:22:07 -0700 Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Received: from zonker.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA079314515; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:21:55 -0700 Received: (from poulton@localhost) by zonker.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.7.1) id OAA11983 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis; Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:21:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <199906172121.OAA11983@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: SFO expansion meetings Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Alternative MDF would still involve
> quite a bit of bay fill but the overall "footprint" on the bay would
> be much smaller.
>
> Naturally, plan MDF would have no windsuring impacts. ;)
I think this is exactly the kind of constructive thing we can push
for. SFO wants it all, but they may well settle for this alternative.
Where can we see the maps of MDF?
Ken Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
"It was the least I could do, which, of course, is what I strive for."
-- Dave Barry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:43 PST