Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA069562234; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:03:54 -0700 Return-Path: <bbense@telemark.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA119842233; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:03:53 -0700 Received: from telemark.stanford.edu (telemark.Stanford.EDU [171.64.12.100]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id JAA13646 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by telemark.stanford.edu (8.9.1/8.7.3) id IAA06237; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:53:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Booker Bense <bbense@networking.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: New old 3rd site rules In-Reply-To: <199807140649.XAA14994@apm-iris1.arc.nasa.gov-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980714084719.6152A-100000@telemark.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, Michael Schuh wrote:
>
> Can someone please fill me in on why the rules have changed at the old
> 3rd site. It used to be that you could park in the parking lot across
> the street a few years back. Well last year it was obvious that the
> lot was full with people working at the building there so I understood
> why they stopped letting us park there. Now this year we have a new
> tenant in the building. This new tenant is having his Pinkerton
> Security Team chase windsurfers off of the grass by the street. The
> Pinkerton employee claims that the grass belongs to the owner of the
> building. I don't agree with this, but have nothing to back up my
> belief with. Does any one know why they are chasing us off the grass
> and if it is really their right to do so?
- I'd guess that they do own that land, so they can enforce this.
Try and find out what the company does and we'll send them nasty
letters.
> The Pinkerton employee also
> said that it was illegal to park on the street side of the "no
> vehicles or dumping" signs. I am not exactly sure what the words on
> the sign are, but as I read them, we are not supposed to have our
> vehicles on the bay side of the signs. Anyone know what the rules here
> are? I understand that the "m" in the ordinance number on the sign stands
> for misdemeanor and you can be arrested and taken to jail on the spot
> for violating the posted code.
>
- Well, you can't park on the road, but AFAIK, the "no vehicles" means
"don't drive on the bike path". I think parking in the obvious places
is okay. Generally no vehicles and no parking are not the same thing.
I'm just guessing on this. I've never heard of anyone getting a ticket
there.
- Booker C. Bense
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:01:31 PST