Re: Natural Bridges

• Next message: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: Natural Bridges"
• Previous message: Ed Scott: "Harry's e-mail"
• Next in thread: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: Natural Bridges"
• Reply: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: Natural Bridges"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA093504345; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:59:09 -0700
Return-Path: <edscott@shell9.ba.best.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA075684340; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:59:00 -0700
Received: from mail-out1.apple.com (mail-out1.apple.com [17.254.0.52]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id NAA08501 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out1.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA33098 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:45:24 -0700
Received: from scv4.apple.com (scv4.apple.com [17.128.100.142]) by mailgate.apple.com (mailgate.apple.com2.0.15) with ESMTP id <B0000716283@mailgate.apple.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:45:19 -0700
Received: from [17.197.20.103] (scoted2.apple.com [17.197.20.103]) by scv4.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA20234; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:45:14 -0700
Message-Id: <199806152045.NAA20234@scv4.apple.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: Re:  Natural Bridges
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 13:45:28 +0100
X-Sender: edscott@shell9.ba.best.com-DeleteThis
X-Mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: Ed Scott <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis>
To: "Wind Talk" <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>, "Alain Dumesny" <alain@wave.engr.sgi.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

>Ed, Natural Bridges didn't look that windy on COTW yesterday (but then
>again it looks like it stopped working by 3). What site do you use to
>get NB wind ?
>
>I've heard that COTW sensor for NB wasn't very good and that the marine lab
>or someone else had better sensors...

I use the Long Marine Lab sensor, which is on Ken's webpage, has a link
through the Slug Video cam, and is on the buoy reports on the Cotw pager.
 If the Cotw sensor reads 11 or above, I check the LML sensor, and if
it's blowing, I go. I find that the Cotw sensor reads 10 lower than the
acutal conditions on a W or SW wind.

-Ed

• Next message: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: Natural Bridges"
• Previous message: Ed Scott: "Harry's e-mail"
• Next in thread: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: Natural Bridges"
• Reply: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: Natural Bridges"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:00:59 PST