Re[2]: current laging tide height, why ?

From: kcorr@framatech.com-DeleteThis
Date: Mon Jul 21 1997 - 09:05:20 PDT


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.18/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA237355581; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 13:06:21 -0700
Return-Path: <kcorr@framatech.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from fti.framatech.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA118495580; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 13:06:20 -0700
From: kcorr@framatech.com-DeleteThis
Received: by fti.framatech.com; id PAA01515; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 15:36:48 -0400
Received: from ftimail.framatech.com(160.84.100.244) by fti.framatech.com via smap (3.2) id xma001445; Mon, 21 Jul 97 15:36:26 -0400
Received: from smtpgateway.framatech.com (ccmail.framatech.com [160.84.100.241]) by ftimail.framatech.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA10232 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 21 Jul 1997 15:26:10 -0400
Received: from ccMail by smtpgateway.framatech.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.00) id AA869513236; Mon, 21 Jul 97 15:27:25 -0500
Message-Id: <9707218695.AA869513236@smtpgateway.framatech.com-DeleteThis>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.00
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 97 11:05:20 -0500
To: <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: Re[2]: current laging tide height, why ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     I think Kirk and Jack are both correct. The bucket water height moves
     up and down leading the current through the hole by a few
     seconds.-Kevin

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: current laging tide height, why ?
Author: <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> at INTERNET
Date: 7/21/97 11:12 AM

>I've been using the site at http://www.rahul.net/cgi-bin/stain/tide-charts.cgi
> to check the tide height and current at 3rd and always wonder why the current
> and height of tide are not exactly in sync. Seem to be off by about 1 hour.
>
> Seems to me that the lowest height should be right when the current is done
> leaving (ebb) and vice versa for high/flood. Why 1 hour lag ? (is there
> surface and under water currents in opposite directions ?)
     
I believe it's simply momentum. There is an enormous amount of water
moving through the bay, it takes a while for it to stop when the tidal
pressure has been equalized.
     
-- Jack
     



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:32:17 PST