Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.18/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA207090848; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 08:34:08 -0700 Return-Path: <dadams@visa.com-DeleteThis> Received: from portal.visa.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA001200847; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 08:34:08 -0700 Received: by portal.visa.com id AA21341 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis); Fri, 20 Jun 1997 08:29:48 -0700 Received: by portal.visa.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Fri, 20 Jun 1997 08:29:48 -0700 Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=Visa%l=SW720_X016-970620152613Z-582@msmailgw2.visa.com-DeleteThis> From: "Adams, Don" <dadams@visa.com-DeleteThis> To: 'Multiple recipients of list' <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Subject: U-turns Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 08:26:13 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52 Encoding: 13 TEXT
After Jim's comment the other day about U-turns, I did notice that he was
quite correct. The intersection north of the 3rd Ave. parking lot is now
marked with "no U-turn" signs in all directions. This makes both
intersections close to 3rd Ave. controlled in this inconvenient manner.
It's not readily apparent when you get in the turn lane to make that U-turn
back toward Foster City because the sign is not located on the island in
the center of the road, but is positioned on the left side of the oncoming
lane. Maybe it's a little entrapment trick to see if we really notice it!
So, if you do get one of these tickets, you could argue in court that the
intersection is improperly marked... but who's got time for court?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:32:04 PST