Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA05440; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 12:02:35 -0700 Return-Path: <rlindig@ccgate.dp.beckman.com-DeleteThis> Received: from biivax.dp.beckman.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA234085353; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 12:02:34 -0700 Received: from ccgate.dp.beckman.com (134.217.246.34) by BIIVAX.DP.BECKMAN.COM (PMDF V5.0-4 #12176) id <01HW8HQF2Z4G8WX70K@BIIVAX.DP.BECKMAN.COM-DeleteThis> for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis; Mon, 09 Oct 1995 11:58:37 -0800 Received: from cc:Mail by ccgate.dp.beckman.com id AA813264980; Mon, 09 Oct 1995 11:43:41 -0800 (pst) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1995 11:43:41 -0800 (pst) From: Robert L Indig <rlindig@ccgate.dp.beckman.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re[2]: New SFBA WWW Site To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Message-Id: <9509098132.AA813264980@ccgate.dp.beckman.com-DeleteThis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Encoding: 26 Text
You are correct, it probably should be .org. When the domain name registration
comes up for renewal we'll look into that.
Bob
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: New SFBA WWW Site
Author: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis at INTERNET
Date: 10/9/95 11:26 AM
> We have changed the SFBA site to http://www.sfba.com/sfba
>
> Let us know what you think. Suggestions and comments
> welcomed.
>
A little administrative question:
Why is it .com and not .org? Somehow I have problems believing that
SFBA is profit-oriented..
Thanks..
--george
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:30:24 PST