Re: Re[3]: Tide Data

From: Ken Poulton (poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Wed Dec 14 1994 - 12:49:09 PST


Received: from zonker-fddi.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA25847; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:49:13 -0800
Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Received: by zonker.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA17245; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:49:09 -0800
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:49:09 -0800
From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Message-Id: <9412142049.AA17245@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Re[3]: Tide Data


> If that's right, then the current *near-shore* *is* the first
> derivative (or slope) of the high-low tide waveform. It's just the
> current in *the channel* that shows a lag from this value.

Correct. The only problem is that we tend to sail in the channels...

Ken Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis

"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as
simply messing about in boats."
                                        -- Toad, "The Wind in the Willows"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:27 PST