Received: from zonker-fddi.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA25847; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:49:13 -0800 Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Received: by zonker.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA17245; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:49:09 -0800 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:49:09 -0800 From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9412142049.AA17245@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Re[3]: Tide Data
> If that's right, then the current *near-shore* *is* the first
> derivative (or slope) of the high-low tide waveform. It's just the
> current in *the channel* that shows a lag from this value.
Correct. The only problem is that we tend to sail in the channels...
Ken Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as
simply messing about in boats."
-- Toad, "The Wind in the Willows"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:27 PST