Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA20232; Tue, 20 Sep 1994 11:33:43 -0700 Return-Path: <kjw@merkle.baaqmd.gov-DeleteThis> Received: from sparc1.baaqmd.GOV by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA24213; Tue, 20 Sep 1994 11:34:01 -0700 Received: from merkle.baaqmd.gov ([192.137.111.250]) by sparc1.baaqmd.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06989; Tue, 20 Sep 94 11:24:46 PDT Received: from cc:Mail by merkle.baaqmd.gov id AA780085781 Tue, 20 Sep 94 11:29:41 pst Date: Tue, 20 Sep 94 11:29:41 pst From: kjw@merkle.baaqmd.gov-DeleteThis Message-Id: <9408207800.AA780085781@merkle.baaqmd.gov-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: 3rd Ave Sailing Site (History)
     The Third Ave sailing site exists because enough concerned windsurfers 
     provided a barrage of written comments when Foster City was seeking to 
     improve its levee system.  If FC did not increase the levee height by 
     some 12" to 18" around the entire perimeter, FEMA was planning to 
     downgrade Foster City's flood designation and cause flood insurance 
     rates to increase for all of Foster City.
     
     Because any project around the bay's shores must get a permit from BCDC 
     (Bay Conservation Development Commission), Foster City was seeking a 
     permit for the levee improvement project.  Randy Anderson's attempts to 
     have the City provide access ramps to the bay were futile.  While most 
     of you were probably offended by Sue Lee or Rick Navaro's comments, 
     they pretty well represent the City's position.  Not necessarily their 
     own.  The City did not have the additional funds and didn't want to 
     deal with the windsurfing access issue at all.  They were also 
     concerned about the attractive nuisance aspect and the possibly of 
     lawsuits.  As part of any permit, BCDC must find (required by law) that 
     the project must provide "the maximum public access feasible."
     
     When the permit application went before the BCDC for public comment 
     and approval, Randy & I spoke on behalf of the windsurfing community.  
     I likened the addition of levee riprap to putting up a six foot 
     cyclone fence around a soccer field.  Yeah we could use it, but it 
     wouldn't be easy.  Another 3 or 4 windsurfers gave well received 
     testimony.  Approximately 250 letters & faxes were also received by 
     the commission.  They were impressed by the level of interest and 
     somewhat dumbfounded by the City's lack of cooperation.  Yet they did 
     not want to hold up a necessary project.  Some board members expressed 
     concern of spending much needed public funds on windsurfing at a time 
     when police & fire departments were being cut.  If the vote had been 
     taken then, it might have been close.  The appointed board member from 
     the delta invited us to sail the delta if we were unwelcome by Foster 
     City.  Then Supervisor Anna Eschoo (Now in Congress) took the Foster 
     City Public Works Director aside & told him to work with us.
     
     After much negotiation between FC & the SFBA and FC & BCDC, the City 
     was issued a conditional permit, conditioned on provisions for the 
     windsurfing access you now see out there.  Randy & Joel Bartlett 
     fought hard to get what we now complain about.  It was questionable 
     whether a parking lot was a necessary mitigation for the levee 
     improvements.  But what the heck, we kinda had them over a barrel.  
     Why not go whole hog.
     
     Randy's & my fear was that the City would get the conditional permit, 
     improve the levee, and then reneg on the windsurfing access.  That was 
     more like their past M.O.  BCDC is virtually powerless as an 
     Enforcement Agency.  The SFBA with the help of an attorney (doing pro 
     bono work) have been unsuccessful at getting Flying Tigers reopened 
     after it was closed off during the Gulf War.  But much to my surprise 
     Foster City provided all the access improvements.  Randy has been 
     pushing the issue of the launch ramp configuration with both BCDC and 
     Foster City.  BCDC representatives have said they will continue to 
     pressure FC to finish the ramp.  But generally, as far as BCDC is 
     concerned, Foster City has meet their permit commitment.
     
     The Randy has got the Director of the Parks & Rec Department to agendize a 
     windsurfing presentation for the City Council for early Nov.  Randy will be 
     holding another parking access meeting in the near future to plan for our 
     presentation.  He feels it is critical to present an organized positive 
     image for our sport.  Stay tuned.    
     
     
     A FEW PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS:
     
     If scrutinized, the existing parking lot may not meet the strictest 
     requirements for emergency vehicle access.  Foster City is very much by 
     the book.  So maybe we should be careful or we may loose an additional 
     5-10 spaces due to No Parking (emergency vehicle turn around).
     
     The golf course proposal may be another opportunity, similar to the 
     levee improvement project, to get additional improvements to the 
     parking area (moving the fences out & paving).  I would suggest a 0$ 
     improvement cost as someone else suggested.  While Randy indicates it 
     is near impossible to get Coastal Conservancy Grants especially 
     without Foster City's cooperation, still I think it is worth looking 
     into it.  One of the BCDC board members suggested we should have 
     looked into it before asking FC to make all these improvements as part 
     of their project.  At least it would be nice to remove this rebuttal 
     for the future.
     
     Lastly, we (the SFBA) need people to pitch in.  Everybody's got ideas, 
     but only a few are willing to put in the time & effort to make a 
     difference.  I feel I owe a debt of gratitude to Randy Anderson for all 
     the work he has done.  He has made a difference to this sport.
     
     
     
     
     
     
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:08 PST