Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA28764; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 19:01:08 -0700 Return-Path: <westes@usc.com-DeleteThis> Received: from uucp4.netcom.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA02176; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 19:01:34 -0700 Received: from localhost by netcomsv.netcom.com with UUCP (8.6.4/SMI-4.1) id SAA24556; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 18:52:09 -0700 Received: by usc.com (NX5.67d/NX3.0M) id AA02521; Wed, 14 Sep 94 18:47:30 -0700 From: Will Estes <westes@usc.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9409150147.AA02521@usc.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: 3rd ave To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Date: Wed, 14 Sep 1994 18:47:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9409142155.AA00181@hpindck.cup.hp.com-DeleteThis> from "kenb@hpindck.cup.hp.com-DeleteThis" at Sep 14, 94 03:01:17 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 636
'kenb@hpindck.cup.hp.com-DeleteThis says:'
> Will Estes <westes@usc.com-DeleteThis> wrote:
>
> > Can we document this position and then make the case to the BCDC that the
> > city has failed to meet its original obligation? If it worked once, then
> > why can't that same path work again?
>
> But has the city failed to meet its original obligation? What was originally
> negotiated between BCDC and FC? What's in writing?
Well, this is the key question. Does someone have more background on what
BCDC promised us, and what FC promised BCDC?
-- Thanks, Will Estes Internet: westes@usc.com-DeleteThis U.S. Computer Saratoga, CA 95070
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:05 PST