Re: SFBA 3rd Avenue Meeting, ...

From: Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis
Date: Sat Jul 30 1994 - 22:09:21 PDT


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA04010; Sat, 30 Jul 1994 22:12:31 -0700
Return-Path: <Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from mail02.prod.aol.net by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA14153; Sat, 30 Jul 1994 22:13:00 -0700
Received: by mail02.prod.aol.net (1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA08931; Sun, 31 Jul 1994 01:09:25 -0400
From: Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis
X-Mailer: America Online Mailer
Sender: "Gr8Jibe" <Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Message-Id: <9407310109.tn409632@aol.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 94 01:09:21 EDT
Subject: Re: SFBA 3rd Avenue Meeting, ...


>>The existing 3rd ave improvements were a result of presure from >>the Bay
Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC). >>Similar to the Coastal
Commision, they protect bay access. The >>BCDC forced Foster City to provide
safe bay access with the levee >>improvements at 3rd Ave..

Wouldn't "safe bay access" include adequate parking to serve the bay users?
 Could we enlist the BCDC to help in our parking crusade?

Bill



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:27:57 PST