Re: mast bases

From: Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis
Date: Tue Jun 28 1994 - 18:11:02 PDT 

Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA17738; Tue, 28 Jun 1994 18:11:08 -0700
Return-Path: <Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from mail02.prod.aol.net by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA16263; Tue, 28 Jun 1994 18:11:07 -0700
Received: by mail02.prod.aol.net (1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA13247; Tue, 28 Jun 1994 21:11:04 -0400
From: Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis
X-Mailer: America Online Mailer
Sender: "Gr8Jibe" <Gr8Jibe@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Message-Id: <9406282111.tn139468@aol.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 94 21:11:02 EDT
Subject: Re: mast bases

I like everything about the fiberspar base except the cleat. in addition to
the chewing of lines, it doesn't allow downhauling with a hook as far as the
clam cleat on the chinook and WSH bases. I've found I don't need the rigging
tools like rig-it-right now that I use good rollers. (anybody want to buy a
rig-it-right?)

Bill

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:27:44 PST